I find it profoundly interesting how people decide when/where violence is "okay". What things they'll be willing to support therein and what things they find unacceptable.
Also, it's very funny watching the media get so upset about everyone seemingly being super cool with the UnitedHealthcare CEO being assassinated. InB4:
> crying Wojak > "Nnnooo, you can't applaud this! He-he had a family! You can't just be cool with executives of evil corporations within fucked-up industries getting murdered! Nooo! Stop! This isn't okay!"
Which, I think underlines how the media is state propaganda and control apparatus vs. being aligned with the interests of the people themselves. It's not often that we get to see such a dichotomy, because usually these things are a lot less clear and more obfuscated/ambiguous as there's not often such a clear consensus and unanimity among the population.
This UnitedHealthcare CEO getting murdered was legitimately like an "everybody liked that" incident, regardless of political divide. Except, the media, being a tool of the capital establishment, must run defense and tell us how "bad" this is and that it's "disturbing" if you're okay with, or openly supportive of, CEOs (like this) being targeted.
Technik versucht uns zunehmend durch sogenanntes Nudging zu erziehen. Dies lässt sich oftmals nicht abschalten. Werden wir bevormundet? Oder hilft es uns, bessere Menschen zu werden?
ich finde, hier werden zT sinnvolle Warnsignale mit Nudging abgetan. Das meint Kühlschrank nach einiger Zeit piept wenn die Tür versehentlich einen Spalt auflbleibt ist doch sinnvoll. Besser, als die Lebensmittel warm werden zu lassen und Energie zu verschwenden...
Interessant, so etwas kenne ich nicht, bis auf Gurtwarner im Auto für Mitfahrer. Ich würde es nicht mögen, auf der anderen Seite kann es such Geld sparen, wie du es beschreibt. Dann wäre es schon Erziehung
In general the population is stupid. The result of public education system designed to make sure the population is only smart enough to be useful to the elites.
@RandomDeamon it really makes me a quite hopeless that about 4/5 of people can't see that the claim "tiktok botnets posting things is election manipulation" is another way of saying "you just are too dumb to decide".
Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies zur Erkennung von wiederkehrenden Besuchern und eingeloggten Nutzern. Durch die weitere Benutzung der Webseite akzeptierst du die Verwendung der Cookies.
👺防空識別區👹 （mix mastering）
Als Antwort auf 👺防空識別區👹 （mix mastering） • • •Also, it's very funny watching the media get so upset about everyone seemingly being super cool with the UnitedHealthcare CEO being assassinated. InB4:
> crying Wojak
> "Nnnooo, you can't applaud this! He-he had a family! You can't just be cool with executives of evil corporations within fucked-up industries getting murdered! Nooo! Stop! This isn't okay!"
👺防空識別區👹 （mix mastering）
Als Antwort auf 👺防空識別區👹 （mix mastering） • • •Which, I think underlines how the media is state propaganda and control apparatus vs. being aligned with the interests of the people themselves. It's not often that we get to see such a dichotomy, because usually these things are a lot less clear and more obfuscated/ambiguous as there's not often such a clear consensus and unanimity among the population.
This UnitedHealthcare CEO getting murdered was legitimately like an "everybody liked that" incident, regardless of political divide. Except, the media, being a tool of the capital establishment, must run defense and tell us how "bad" this is and that it's "disturbing" if you're okay with, or openly supportive of, CEOs (like this) being targeted.