"The court [argued] that the cultural heritage code does not protect intellectual works or their creators but aims to preserve collective memory and foster cultural development. Authorisation and concession fees are thus tools for the protection of cultural heritage rather than for income generation."
What utter, transparent bullshit.
As usual, copyright is damage.
communia-association.org/2024/…
A case as sweet and sour as balsamic vinegar
We have extensively followed the saga around the Italian cultural heritage code, as evidenced by a series of blog posts on lawsuits involving commercial uses of Public Domain works in Italian collections.Deborah De Angelis (Communia Association)
Mike Taylor 🦕
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •Mike Taylor 🦕
Unbekannter Ursprungsbeitrag • • •